Help support TMP


"Artillery deployed in woods?" Topic


15 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not post offers to buy and sell on the main forum.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the ACW Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

American Civil War

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Fix Bayonets!


Rating: gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

CSS Mississippi

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian completes a Confederate river ironclad.


Featured Workbench Article


Featured Profile Article

Remembering Marx WOW Figures

If you were a kid in the 1960s who loved history and toy soldiers, you probably had a WOW figure!


497 hits since 7 May 2024
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Blackhorse MP07 May 2024 4:35 p.m. PST

Just wondering about the feasibility of allowing artillery batteries to deploy in and fight from woods. Not the tangled jungle-like mess featured at Chancellorsville or Grant's Overland campaign, those are obvious No-Go's, but average run-of-the-mill woods like that likely to be found on any given ACW battlefield. Light Woods, for lack of a better term.

I use home-brewed rules and design my own scenarios, and have been allowing batteries to deploy in and fight from Light Woods. However, something just feels off about that, so I thought I'd seek some advice from the TMP faithful.

So yay or nay to artillery in the woods? Thanks in advance for any input.

Cleburne186307 May 2024 4:45 p.m. PST

Yes, happened all the time. Moreso with open woods like most (but not all of) Chickamauga. Culps Hill at Gettysburg was in the woods and they moved guns up there. Same with just about anywhere in the Atlanta Campaign in areas like New Hope Church or the Lost Mountain-Brushy Mountain line.

Frederick Supporting Member of TMP07 May 2024 5:35 p.m. PST

Depends on the woods but there were a number of places as noted by Cleburne 1863 where the woods were open enough to allow passage of guns

79thPA Supporting Member of TMP07 May 2024 7:51 p.m. PST

link

Like in the above painting? All of the time. You could find a gun any where it had room to deploy.

Martin Rapier08 May 2024 12:01 a.m. PST

If you can't deploy guns in open woods in the ACW, there really isn't anywhere for them to go!

Col Durnford Supporting Member of TMP08 May 2024 7:11 a.m. PST

Hopefully, your rules (like mine) penalize artillery movement thru woods. A few turns ago, I moved a battery to a wooded hilltop position. The movement cost kept the battery out of action for a considerable period of time.

14Bore08 May 2024 11:11 a.m. PST

Would think the underbrush being present or not is the tell. Trees far enough apart is easy, or farm paths through. Find a woods and think could you get a truck with a trailer through that.

rmaker08 May 2024 11:55 a.m. PST

In the edge of the woods, ok. Otherwise, no clear field of fire.

Blackhorse MP08 May 2024 12:33 p.m. PST

Well, in my rules I just classify woods as Light and Heavy, the former artillery can operate in and the latter it can't. The main difference as I envision it is that Heavy woods has the Chancellorsville-like underbrush and the Light woods do not. Never really thought much about the spacing of the trees, but I guess that's a major consideration. There are, of course, movement penalties for everyone operating in woods.

So I guess I will continue to consider Heavy woods to be the Chancellorsville-like mess, which precludes artillery and start thinking of Light woods as having more widely spaced trees in addition to an absence of significant undergrowth, which will allow guns to operate within. Totally changes my mental image when I visualize things. Yep, that'll work.

Thanks so much for the input. You all seem to be pretty much in lockstep on this making me realize my misgivings were mispaced.thumbs up

Cleburne186308 May 2024 2:46 p.m. PST

Blackhorse, yet the Confederates deployed several batteries in the woods north of Saunders Field in the Wilderness…

AussieAndy08 May 2024 5:10 p.m. PST

Even relatively heavy woods may have clearings or at least less densely forested areas. If you are defending in woods, then I can't see why you wouldn't deploy artillery if there is room. Cannister can still do the job.

Personal logo Dal Gavan Supporting Member of TMP09 May 2024 4:55 a.m. PST

Other considerations are that there has to be room for the guns to recoil when firing, and enough room for the caissons to be deployed.

Personal logo KimRYoung Supporting Member of TMP09 May 2024 9:28 a.m. PST

and enough room for the caissons to be deployed.

Preferred, but not always. Smith's 4th NY deployed 4 of it's six guns by hand hauling them through the Devils Den to a position on Houck's Ridge. There was not even room for the limber teams, let alone the caisson's, and the ammunition had to hand hauled to the guns.

Boulders and broken ground can be as big an obstacle as woods to find a good location to position artillery. Persistence could sometimes override practicality. Even at the Battle of the Wilderness both sides were able to position a section or two of guns astride the Orange Plank Road running through the densest woods ever fought in.

Kim

Personal logo Dal Gavan Supporting Member of TMP10 May 2024 11:16 a.m. PST

They can always find somewhere to put a gun, KRY, but without the caissons and ability to concentrate the battery fire then they won't be as effective.

Though the effect on the troops who found four enemy guns overlooking Devil's Den probably made up for that.

14Bore10 May 2024 11:49 a.m. PST

Thinking, and did it in a game once, had a artillery unit back into woods, bit it would be no escape

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.