Help support TMP


"FlankPanther Coelian..." Topic


8 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the WWII Land Gallery Message Board

Back to the Dioramas Message Board

Back to the Terrain and Scenics Message Board


Areas of Interest

General
World War Two on the Land

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Quickie Figs


Rating: gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Coverbinding at Staples

How does coverbinding work?


Featured Workbench Article

Around the World in 80 Days

Everyone has a pile of shame - miniatures that you were all hot to get, had big plans for, and then never did anything with...


Featured Profile Article

The Simtac Tour

The Editor is invited to tour the factory of Simtac, a U.S. manufacturer of figures in nearly all periods, scales, and genres.


Current Poll


436 hits since 29 Apr 2024
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0129 Apr 2024 5:22 p.m. PST

(Maquette Dragon réf 6358 + tourelle Verlinden réf 441/ 1/35)


"I present to you my new project, the 1/35 Flakpanther. The Flakpanther was a self-propelled anti-aircraft gun project developed by the Rheinmetall firm during World War II for German forces. It was intended to be armed with two 37mm flak 43 cannons in a rotating, fully enclosed turret on a Panther chassis. but unfortunately the tank was not built before the end of the war in Europe…"
OT


picture

picture

From this Blog


link

Armand

Rich Bliss29 Apr 2024 7:06 p.m. PST

"Unfortunately "? What was it going to accomplish?

Personal logo deadhead Supporting Member of TMP30 Apr 2024 4:45 a.m. PST

I have never understood the concept behind this. A Panther swapping its turret and main armament for twin 37mm AA guns. Seems a massive waste of a precious resource.

Disco Joe30 Apr 2024 9:42 a.m. PST

So what would you have suggested they use to provide anti aircraft support?
Their other vehicles they used was all open top vehicles which means the crew was open to fighters strafing them. At least this provided the crew some protection.

Tango0130 Apr 2024 3:36 p.m. PST

Thanks

Armand

Bunkermeister Supporting Member of TMP30 Apr 2024 8:10 p.m. PST

Not unlike the Gepard and the SGT York and other modern AA guns that are carried on main battle tanks, so not really so bad an idea.

Like nearly every WWII German super weapon the best they could hope for was to hold out until early August 1945 when they would be forced to surrender no matter what else they developed.

Bunkermeister

Personal logo deadhead Supporting Member of TMP30 Apr 2024 11:12 p.m. PST

But was not the protection a degree of overkill, when AFVs were so scarce? The protection of the precious hull is against all but the heaviest (or fastest) AP rounds, not what an aircraft threatens.

Modern variants enjoy the luxury of ready availability, so it is simplest and probably cheapest to use an existing hull, rather than redesign. Back then, maybe use obsolete or all those beute chassis models?

Disco Joe02 May 2024 1:44 p.m. PST

"But was not the protection a degree of overkill"
So then I take it that you feel if the crew in an open hull is killed then so be it.
And not all of the beute chassis could handle an enclosed gun such as what was being proposed here.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.